Flexible optimal bus‐schedule bridging for metro operation‐interruption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Under the sudden interruption of the metro, it is significant to dispatch emergency bridging buses to evacuate stranded passengers to improve linkage management and service reliability. Aiming at the problem of emergency bridging bus scheduling, considering the remaining capacity of conventional buses, passenger tolerance, and site convenience, a flexible combined emergency bridging bus scheduling model is constructed based on the constraints of vehicle capacity, dispatching capacity, and maximum evacuation times of emergency bridging bus, aiming at minimizing the maximum evacuation time and passenger delay. The improved Harris hawk algorithm is used to solve the model, and the evacuation plan of the demand‐responsive and station‐station bridging lines is obtained. The maximum evacuation time is 41 min, and the average delay of stranded passengers is 19 min. The results show that the maximum evacuation time is 10% and 27% less than the fixed combined and single scheduling. The average delay is 16% and 42% less than the fixed combination and traditional single scheduling. The sensitivity analysis of the influencing factors of emergency bridging bus scheduling is conducted. The results show that the flexible combined emergency bridging bus scheduling model constructed in this paper can improve evacuation efficiency and reduce passenger travel delays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it