MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394800606 · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00073-5

Safety and efficacy of losmapimod in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (ReDUX4): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial

2024· article· en· W4394800606 on OpenAlexaff
Rabi Tawil, Kathryn R. Wagner, Johanna Hamel, Doris G. Leung, Jeffrey Statland, Leo H. Wang, Angela Genge, Sabrina Sacconi, Hanns Lochmüller, David Reyes‐Leiva, Jordi Díaz‐Manera, Jorge Alonso‐Pérez, Nuria Muelas, Juan J. Vílchez, Alan Pestronk, Summer Gibson, Namita Goyal, Lawrence J. Hayward, Nicholas J. Johnson, Samantha LoRusso, Miriam Freimer, Perry B. Shieh, S. H. Subramony, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Joost Kools, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Per Widholm, Christopher Morabito, Christopher M. Moxham, Diego Cadavid, Michelle Mellion, Adefowope Odueyungbo, William Tracewell, Anthony Accorsi, Lucienne Ronco, Robert J. Gould, Jennifer Shoskes, Luis Alejandro Rojas, John Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophyMedicineTolerabilityClinical endpointPlaceboMuscular dystrophyInternal medicinePhysical therapyClinical trialSurrogate endpointMuscle biopsyAdverse effectBiopsyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet NeurologySame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207