MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394803056 · doi:10.5406/23256672.100.3.05

<i>She does not go.</i> Immaginazioni geografiche al femminile in Pirandello

2023· article· it· W4394803056 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueItalica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesNovellaArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Il contributo si focalizza sulla rappresentazione dell'immaginario spaziale femminile agli inizi del ‘900 offerta da Pirandello, indagando come le donne si rapportino—in concreto e in astratto—con un orizzonte geografico altro, come questa ‘immaginazione geografica’ sia utilizzata come strategia di evasione dalla clausura domestica, e quali meccanismi psicologici siano attivati dall'idea di allontanarsi dai luoghi familiari. L'analisi si concentra in particolare sul personaggio di Silia nel Giuoco delle parti, Marta Ajala nel romanzo L'esclusa, e sulle novelle “Il viaggio,” “Mondo di carta,” “Pubertà,” “Nell'albergo è morto un tale,” “L'altro figlio.” La fantasticheria geografica, evidente in alcuni dei più noti testi pirandelliani (si pensi alla novella “Il treno ha fischiato . . . ”), risulta forse ancor più presente nei personaggi femminili; al contrario, la prospettiva di un viaggio concreto tipicamente è vissuta dalle donne rappresentate da Pirandello non come un'opportunità di liberazione, ma come un vero e proprio trauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it