MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394807924 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109750

Bispecific radioimmunoconjugates exploit receptor heterogeneity for positron emission tomography of tumors expressing HER2 and/or EGFR

2024· article· en· W4394807924 on OpenAlexafffund
Luke Yongkyu Kwon, Zhongli Cai, Azza Al‐Mahrouki, Raymond M. Reilly

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity Health Network
KeywordsTrastuzumabPositron emission tomographyCancer researchBreast cancerMolecular imagingChemistryCancerMedicineNuclear medicineInternal medicineBiologyIn vivoGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HER2 heterogeneity is a challenge for molecular imaging or treating HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). EGFR is coexpressed in some tumors exhibiting HER2 heterogeneity. Bispecific radioimmunoconjugates (bsRICs) that bind HER2 and EGFR were constructed by linking trastuzumab Fab through polyethyleneglycol (PEG 24 ) to EGF. We established s.c. tumors in NOD-SCID mice that homogeneously or heterogeneously expressed HER2 and/or EGFR by the inoculation of HER2-positive/EGFR-negative SK-OV-3 cells, EGFR-positive/HER2-negative MDA-MB-468 cells or mixtures of these cells. [ 64 Cu]Cu-NOTA-trastuzumab Fab-PEG 24 -EGF were compared to [ 64 Cu]Cu-NOTA-trastuzumab Fab or [ 64 Cu]Cu-NOTA-EGF for the PET imaging of HER2 and/or EGFR-positive tumors. [ 64 Cu]Cu-NOTA-trastuzumab Fab-PEG 24 -EGF bsRICs imaged tumors expressing HER2 or EGFR or heterogeneously expressing these receptors, while monospecific agents only imaged HER2-or EGFR-positive tumors. Our results indicate that bsRICs labeled with 64 Cu are able to exploit receptor heterogeneity for tumor imaging. PET may select patients for radioimmunotherapy with bsRICs complexed to the β-particle emitter, 177 Lu or Auger electron-emitter, 111 In in a theranostic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207