MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394808211 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084033

Covariant <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>-scheme effective dynamics, mimetic gravity, and nonsingular black holes: Applications to spherically symmetric quantum gravity

2024· article· en· W4394808211 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Muxin Han, Hongguang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriquePennsylvania State UniversityWestern UniversityFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCovariant transformationPhysicsMathematical physicsBlack hole (networking)SpacetimeAlgorithmMathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new $\overline{\ensuremath{\mu}}$-scheme Hamiltonian effective dynamics in the spherical symmetric spacetime which is generally covariant as derived from a covariant Lagrangian. The Lagrangian belongs to the class of extended mimetic gravity Lagrangians in four dimensions. We apply the effective dynamics to both cosmology and black hole. The effective dynamics reproduces the nonsingular loop-quantum-cosmology effective dynamics. From the effective dynamics, we obtain the nonsingular black hole solution, which has a killing symmetry in addition to the spherical symmetry and reduces to the Schwarzschild geometry asymptotically near the infinity. The black hole spacetime resolves the classical singularity and approaches asymptotically the Nariai geometry ${\mathrm{dS}}_{2}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{S}^{2}$ at the future infinity in the interior of the black hole. The resulting black hole spacetime has the complete future null infinity ${\ensuremath{\mathcal{I}}}^{+}$. Thanks to the general covariance, the effective dynamics can be reformulated in the light cone gauge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207