A Discrete Risk-Theory Approach to Manage Equity-Linked Policies in an Incomplete Market
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We construct a model where, at each time instance, risky securities can only take a limited number of values and the equity-linked policy sold by the insurer to policyholders pays benefits linked to these securities. Since the number of states in the model exceeds the number of securities in the (incomplete) market, the martingale measure is not unique, posing a problem in pricing insurance instruments. In this framework, we consider how a super-replicating strategy violates the assumption of absence of arbitrage, yet simultaneously allows the insurance company to fully hedge against financial risk. Since the super-replicating strategy, when considered alone, would be too costly for any rational insured person, through the definition of the safety loading, we demonstrate how the insurer can still hedge against financial risk, albeit at the expense of increasing its exposure to demographic risk. This approach does not aim to show how the pricing of the index-linked policy can actually be performed but rather highlights how risk theory-based approaches (via the definition of the profit and loss random variable) enable the management of the trade-off between financial risk and demographic risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".