Early-Season Crop Classification Based on Local Window Attention Transformer with Time-Series RCM and Sentinel-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop classification is indispensable for agricultural monitoring and food security, but early-season mapping has remained challenging. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR), such as RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) and Sentinel-1, can meet higher requirements on the reliability of satellite data acquisition with all-weather and all-day imaging capability to supply dense observations in the early crop season. This study applied the local window attention transformer (LWAT) to time-series SAR data, including RCM and Sentinel-1, for early-season crop classification. The performance of this integration was evaluated over crop-dominated regions (corn, soybean and wheat) in southwest Ontario, Canada. Comparative analyses against several machine learning and deep learning methods revealed the superiority of the LWAT, achieving an impressive F1-score of 97.96% and a Kappa coefficient of 97.08% for the northern crop region and F1-scores of 98.07% and 97.02% for the southern crop region when leveraging time-series data from RCM and Sentinel-1, respectively. Additionally, by the incremental procedure, the evolution of accuracy determined by RCM and Sentinel-1 was analyzed, which demonstrated that RCM performed better at the beginning of the season and could achieve comparable accuracy to that achieved by utilizing both datasets. Moreover, the beginning of stem elongation of corn was identified as a crucial phenological stage to acquire acceptable crop maps in the early season. This study explores the potential of RCM to provide reliable prior information early enough to assist with in-season production forecasting and decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".