Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vandana Shiva se encuentra entre las ecofeministas más conocidas dentro y fuera del mundo académico. Este artículo examinará las propuestas de algunas de sus obras—Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development (1988), Ecofeminism (coescrito con Maria Mies, 1993), Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability and Peace (2005) y Terra Viva: My Life in a Biodiversity of Movements (2022)—junto con los principios del posthumanismo ético. En cuanto al último, me apoyaré en el trabajo de Stacy Alaimo, Karen Barad, Jane Bennet, Rosi Braidotti y Donna Haraway. Mi análisis mostrará que las ideas de Shiva anticipan y dialogan con las de las autoras mencionadas. Por tanto, evaluaré cuestiones tales como: la crítica a la jerarquía humano/no humano, especialmente entre mujeres privilegiadas y no privilegiadas; la sabiduría ecológica de las mujeres tribales; el llamado mundo natural como ejemplo de relaciones éticas; la importancia de la cooperación, el cuidado y el amor para sostener la vida; la capacidad agente y la subjetividad de lo no humano; y la interconexión entre lo humano y lo no humano. En definitiva, el artículo espera demostrar que la obra de Shiva prevé el posthumanismo ético.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".