MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearings Under Variable Working Conditions Based on EOS-CNN

2023· article· en· W4394830041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Liu, Yaqiong Lv, Xiaoling Guo, Xian Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFault (geology)Variable (mathematics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceAutomotive engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)Reliability engineeringEngineeringGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under time-varying working conditions, the vibration signals of rolling bearings have problems such as amplitude changes, pulsating impact intervals, non-constant sampling phase, and signal noise pollution. These factors making it difficult for data-driven methods to learn the feature information of the signals and achieve intelligent diagnosis of rolling bearings under variable working conditions. To address this issue, a rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on envelope order spectrum and convolutional neural network (EOS-CNN) is proposed in this paper. First, an improved variational mode decomposition (VMD) method is used to decompose the original signal to obtain the optimal Intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Then, the EOS features of IMFs are extracted using the Hilbert order transform (HOT). Finally, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN)-based classifier is employed to classify the extracted features and achieve intelligent diagnosis of rolling bearing faults. The proposed method is verified by publicly available variable speed bearing dataset from Ottawa University. The experiments results show that the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method with envelope order analysis-based fault features as input is much higher than that of the original signal as input, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207