NEOPROTEROZOIC DIAMICTITES OF THE MIDDLE TIANSHAN, KYRGYZSTAN: AGE, DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS AND PROVENANCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the aim to improve our understanding of the age and genesis of the Neoproterozoic diamictites of the Middle Tianshan of Kyrgyzstan, we studied the late Precambrian strata of the Sandalash, Talas and Chatkal Ranges. The results of detrital zircon dating indicate that diamictites were deposited in the Cryogenian and Ediacaran. Diamictites in the lower part of the Shorashu Formation comprise tillites and were likely deposited during the Marino glaciation ca 640–635 Ma. Diamictites in the upper part of the Shorashu Formation represent debris flows and grain flows associated with turbidites and, apparently, have non-glacial origin; their age is not older than the early Ediacaran 616 ± 7 Ma. The pinching out of the Shorashu Formation to the north and the predominantly southerly directions of sediment transport in turbidites indicate that a non-depositional uplift located north of the basin. The distributions of detrital zircon ages in the studied samples are characterized by large peaks at 0.7–0.8 and 1.8–1.9 Ga and small peaks at ca 2.4–2.5 Ga and are almost identical to the age distributions in the Proterozoic sediments of the Tarim Craton. Comparison of the studied strata with key sections of the Kuruktag Range in the NE Tarim suggests that the diamictites of the lower part of the Shorashu Formation are analogues of late Cryogenian Tereeken tillites, and the slope facies of the upper part of the section are analogues of the early Ediacaran turbidites of the Zhamokti and Yukkengol Formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".