MP67-17 PERIOPERATIVE AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER LOCAL TUMOR ABLATION FOR COMPLEX (PADUA SCORE ≥10) RENAL TUMORS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy V (MP67)1 May 2024MP67-17 PERIOPERATIVE AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER LOCAL TUMOR ABLATION FOR COMPLEX (PADUA SCORE ≥10) RENAL TUMORS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS Pietro Piazza, Lorenzo Bianchi, Stefano Luzzago, Marco Bandini, Angelo Mottaran, Sasan Amirhassankhani, Stefano Puliatti, Bernardino De Concilio, Antonio Celia, Carla Serra, Alberta Cappelli, Rita Golfieri, Gennaro Musi, Andrea Gallina, Michele Rizzo, Giovanni Liguori, Carlo Trombetta, Riccardo Schiavina, Ottavio De Cobelli, Francesco Montorsi, and Eugenio Brunocilla Pietro PiazzaPietro Piazza , Lorenzo BianchiLorenzo Bianchi , Stefano LuzzagoStefano Luzzago , Marco BandiniMarco Bandini , Angelo MottaranAngelo Mottaran , Sasan AmirhassankhaniSasan Amirhassankhani , Stefano PuliattiStefano Puliatti , Bernardino De ConcilioBernardino De Concilio , Antonio CeliaAntonio Celia , Carla SerraCarla Serra , Alberta CappelliAlberta Cappelli , Rita GolfieriRita Golfieri , Gennaro MusiGennaro Musi , Andrea GallinaAndrea Gallina , Michele RizzoMichele Rizzo , Giovanni LiguoriGiovanni Liguori , Carlo TrombettaCarlo Trombetta , Riccardo SchiavinaRiccardo Schiavina , Ottavio De CobelliOttavio De Cobelli , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi , and Eugenio BrunocillaEugenio Brunocilla View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001009496.54470.10.17AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Complex renal masses have a non-negligible risk of perioperative complications due to their inherent anatomical characteristics. Local tumor ablation (LTA) could be an useful tool to approach these tumors in patients unfit for surgery or with hampered renal function. However, oncological and perioperative outcomes of these patients remain undereported. The objective of this study was to report the perioperative and long-term of LTA (including Radiofrequency ablation [RFA], Cryoablation [Cryo], Microwave ablation [MW]) for complex masses (PADUA score ≥10). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 102 patients treated with LTA for complex (PADUA ≥10) renal tumors at 5 European tertiary centers. Patients were treated with percutaneous RFA, Cryo or MW according to the technique available in each center. Categorical and continuous variables were reported as proportions and median±interquartile ranges (IQR), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to investigate 5-years recurrence free survival (RFS). Multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to identify predictors of local recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of post-operative complications. RESULTS: Overall, 40 (39%), 37 (36%) and 25 (25%) patients underwent RFA, Cryo and MW ablation, respectively. Of those, 55 (54%), 24 (24%), 22 (22%) and 1 (1%) had a PADUA score of 10, 11, 12 and 13, respectively. Median tumor size was 3 (2.2-3.7). At biopsy, 71 (70%), 12 (12%), 3 (3%) and 2 (2%) had clear cell, papillary, chromophobe and mixed renal carcinoma, respectively. In the perioperative period, 26 (25%) patients experienced post-operative complications. During a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 49-87), 22 (24%) and 9 (12%) patients experienced local and systemic recurrence, respectively, with a 5-years RFS of 57.3%. At multivariable Cox's analysis, papillary histology (HR 0.15, CI 0.01-0.88, p=0.032) was the only independent predictors of RFS. At multivariable logistic regression, the use of RFA (OR 2.56, CI 1.58-8.6, p=0.045) was the only independent predictor of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: LTA is a viable treatment for patients with complex (PADUA ≥10) renal masses, who are considered at higher risk for surgery. However, patients should be accurately counseled due to the higher rates of complication and disease recurrence these patients might experience, when compared with analogues cases treated with nephron sparing surgery. Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e1105 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Pietro Piazza More articles by this author Lorenzo Bianchi More articles by this author Stefano Luzzago More articles by this author Marco Bandini More articles by this author Angelo Mottaran More articles by this author Sasan Amirhassankhani More articles by this author Stefano Puliatti More articles by this author Bernardino De Concilio More articles by this author Antonio Celia More articles by this author Carla Serra More articles by this author Alberta Cappelli More articles by this author Rita Golfieri More articles by this author Gennaro Musi More articles by this author Andrea Gallina More articles by this author Michele Rizzo More articles by this author Giovanni Liguori More articles by this author Carlo Trombetta More articles by this author Riccardo Schiavina More articles by this author Ottavio De Cobelli More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi More articles by this author Eugenio Brunocilla More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".