MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394836267 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-8kk96

HinZip, a designed frankenprotein that combines Hin recombinase and FosW, mimics the structure and DNA-binding function of the HD-Zip plant transcription factor family

2024· preprint· en· W4394836267 on OpenAlexafffund
Raneem Akel, Rama Edaibis, Jumi A. Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCancer Research Society
KeywordsTranscription factorDNARecombinaseGeneticsDNA-binding proteinStructure functionBiologyComputational biologyMolecular biologyPhysicsRecombinationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small bespoke proteins that bind a desired DNA sequence in a cell's genome could be a powerful tool in various applications. Examples include using genetically encoded tools to control gene circuits in synthetic biology, or serve as a protein drug that inhibits a disease network impacting human health. We designed HinZip to bind a specific target comprising at least 24 base pairs with high affinity and DNA sequence specificity, because a larger DNA sequence is likely to be unique in a genome, thereby minimizing off-target effects. We took inspiration from the HD-Zip, a transcription factor family only found in plants. No high-resolution structures exist for HD-Zip: genome-wide analyses indicate that they use a homeodomain to bind DNA and leucine zipper for dimerization. HinZip is a fusion of the Hin recombinase DNA-binding domain and FosW leucine zipper. HinZip binds cooperatively as a dimer to DNA targets comprising two 12 base-pair hixC half-sites. Using bacterial one-hybrid and quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we tested spacings of 0-9 base pairs between half-sites to optimize the orientation and space parameters that FosW needs for coiled-coil dimerization. HinZip binds cooperatively to a 29 base-pair inverted hixC palindrome with Kd 17 nM and no binding to nonspecific DNA up to 2 µM protein. Hin—which lacks ability to dimerize—was previously shown to bind hixC with Kd 34 nM, showing similar binding to half- or full-sites and no cooperativity. HinZip/LA, where the Leu residues responsible for dimerization were replaced with Ala, showed virtually no benefit from cooperative binding at any full-site, and bound first as a monomer, and then as two monomers. Circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering indicate that only HinZip is capable of forming a coiled-coil dimer. HinZip demonstrates that even in the absence of guidance from structural information, small frankenproteins designed from cut-and-paste of unrelated protein modules can specifically target long DNA sequences with broad applications toward orthogonally controlling gene networks in a wide variety of organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxiv→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→