MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394840364 · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ad3f26

Magnetic enhancement of the electrical asymmetry effect in capacitively coupled plasmas

2024· article· en· W4394840364 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Doyle, Rod Boswell, Christine Charles, James Dedrick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsCapacitively coupled plasmaTopology (electrical circuits)Magnetic fieldAsymmetryPlasmaVoltageRadio frequencyPhysicsMaterials scienceComputational physicsInductively coupled plasmaElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of real-time control strategies for key discharge parameters, such as densities, fluxes, and energy distributions, is of fundamental interest to many plasma sources. Over the last decade, multi-harmonic ‘tailored’ voltage waveforms have been successfully employed to achieve enhanced control of key parameters in a wide range of radio-frequency (RF) plasma sources through application of the electrical asymmetry effect (EAE). More recently, the analogous magnetic asymmetry effect (MAE) has been numerically and experimentally demonstrated to achieve a notable degree of control in parallel plate RF plasma sources. The MAE is achieved via selectively magnetising the charged species adjacent to one electrode, altering the charge flux to the surface and enforcing a DC self-bias to maintain quasineutrality. This study addresses the degree of control achieved by the MAE in a non-planar geometry via 2D fluid/kinetic simulations of a magnetised RF capacitively coupled plasma source employing two different magnetic topologies. The simultaneous application of the EAE and MAE is then presented for the same geometry, demonstrating a degree of non-linear behaviour dependant upon the applied magnetic topology. Control of the DC self-bias voltage <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>dc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is demonstrated for a single <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>600</mml:mn> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>pp</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , 13.56 MHz discharge in both ‘convergent’ (maximum on-axis field strength) and ‘divergent’ (minimum on-axis field strength) magnetic topolgies. MAE induced modulations of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>dc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mn>0.13</mml:mn> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>pp</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>dc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>pp</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> are achieved for each magnetic topology, respectively, for magnetic field strengths between 50 and 1000 G. Simultaneous application of an EAE and MAE is achieved through a multi-harmonic ‘peak’-type tailored voltage waveform employing varying harmonic phase offsets between <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mtext>⩽</mml:mtext> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mtext>⩽</mml:mtext> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>360</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The degree to which the DC self-bias voltage is modulated by the applied EAE is mediated by the orientation and magnitude of the applied magnetic field. The EAE induced DC self-bias modulations exhibit non-linear behaviour in response to a superimposed MAE, such that the resulting DC self-bias differs from an additive combination of the two effects alone Simultaneous application of the electrical and MAEs offers the possibility of further decoupling ion and electron dynamics in RF plasma sources, and represents an improvement over each approach in isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207