MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394841746 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2024.3386109

Dielectric Spectrum Extraction of Liquids Using Noncontact Microwave Split Ring Resonator

2024· article· en· W4394841746 on OpenAlexafffund
Wendi Zhu, Masoud Baghelani, Ashwin K. Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersInnovation for Defence Excellence and Security
KeywordsMicrowaveResonatorDielectricMaterials scienceSplit-ring resonatorRing (chemistry)Optical ring resonatorsDielectric resonator antennaDielectric resonatorExtraction (chemistry)AcousticsOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel method for broadband dielectric spectroscopy of liquids utilizing a noncontact microwave split ring resonator (SRR). The proposed approach leverages the multiharmonic property of the microwave resonator to extract the permittivity of the liquid-under-test (LUT) at resonance frequencies. By fitting these extracted values using the Debye model, both the real and imaginary dielectric spectra of the LUT can be determined across a wide frequency range. The proposed method requires a one-time calibration process to ensure high accuracy. An experiment employing five calibration samples and five test samples was performed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results of the extracted permittivity spectrum using the proposed method are compared with those from a commercial dielectric probe. The proposed method exhibits high accuracy with a root mean square error of 0.59 for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\epsilon'$</tex-math> </inline-formula> values at the resonance frequencies. For the extracted Debye model parameters, the proposed method achieves reasonable precision with percentage errors of 1.40% for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\epsilon_s$</tex-math> </inline-formula> , 12.68% for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\epsilon_{\infty}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> , and 7.86% for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math> </inline-formula> and is a cost-effective and accurate solution for dielectric spectroscopy. Due to its planar structure, the microwave SRR can be seamlessly integrated into various systems, holding potential for applying this method in microwave sensing, noninvasive biological sensing, oil and gas industries, and other fields requiring dielectric spectroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207