MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394843841 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2024.3389048

Stochastic Resource Optimization for Metaverse Data Marketplace by Leveraging Quantum Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4394843841 on OpenAlexaff
Mahzabeen Emu, Salimur Choudhury, Kai Salomaa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMetaverseReservationResource allocationData scienceVirtual realityArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaverse can unleash the potentials of Internet of Sense (IoS) communication by intertwining objects and environment between physical world and parallel virtual world. In order to digitally experience smell or taste and navigate effortlessly in virtual reality, optimal resource allocation to strengthen sensing data based infrastructure system is a critical research challenge. The Metaverse Infrastructure Service Providers (MISPs) tap into data marketplace and subscribe to resources in advance for fulfilling the needs of data consumers and users. The demand of the data based services being uncertain, non-optimal subscription schemes may lead to unwanted resource wastage or shortage. Thus, we propose a Stochastic Integer Programming (SIP) model with two phase reservation and on-demand plans for optimal resource allocation in data marketplace. Further along this line, we strive to predict the demand by leveraging Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) that is able to learn with fewer historical data in comparison to classical machine/deep learning paradigms. Extensive simulation results justify that QNN as a supporting model can significantly reduce the computational complexities of SIP formulation. This research can contribute to reduce Metaverse resource fabrication costs, upgrade the profit margin for MISPs by increasing data based service sales revenue, provide real-time resource management decisions, and overall make real impacts in the virtual world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207