MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394849226 · doi:10.1177/08927057241248040

Current application of recycled waste plastics as a sustainable materials: A review on availability, processing and application

2024· review· en· W4394849226 on OpenAlexaff
Isiaka Oluwole Oladele, Christian Junior Okoro, Samson Oluwagbenga Adelani, Newton Itua Agbeboh, Olakunle Timothy Betiku

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepurposingAutomotive industryWaste managementRaw materialFossil fuelBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interest in green environment and sustainable materials in agreement with government regulations have been the motivating force for researchers and various industries globally in recent times. This current need for novel materials along with ever-increasing environmental apprehensions has prompted global researchers to intensify their activities in repurposing waste plastics. Waste plastics in many parts of the world, present a substantial menace to the environment on a global scale underscoring the necessity of this review to spotlight methods for safely and economically managing and converting these materials into valuable end products. The review paper reveals the accessibility and vast potential of a class of materials that was previously deemed as waste but now finding beneficial applications. Hence, diverse sectors where products from waste plastic-based materials are applicable such as construction, electronics, agriculture, automotive, household goods, sports gear, and fossil fuel were considered. Thus, the review reveals waste plastics as readily accessible raw materials for various applications, thereby, aiding in environmental pollution mitigation efforts and value addition to waste plastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermoplastic Composite MaterialsSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207