The airway microbiome of persons with cystic fibrosis correlates with acquisition and microbiological outcomes of incident Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale Chronic infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) has been linked to an increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations and lung function decline. We sought to establish whether baseline sputum microbiome associates with risk of S. maltophilia incident infection and persistence in pwCF. Methods pwCF experiencing incident S. maltophilia infections attending the Calgary Adult CF Clinic from 2010–2018 were compared with S. maltophilia-negative sex, age (+/−2 years), and birth-cohort-matched controls. Infection outcomes were classified as persistent (when the pathogen was recovered in ≥50% of cultures in the subsequent year) or transient. We assessed microbial communities from prospectively biobanked sputum using V3-V4 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing, in the year preceding (Pre) (n = 57), at (At) (n = 22), and after (Post) (n = 31) incident infection. We verified relative abundance data using S. maltophilia-specific qPCR and 16S rRNA-targeted qPCR to assess bioburden. Strains were typed using pulse-field gel electrophoresis. Results Twenty-five pwCF with incident S. maltophilia (56% female, median 29 years, median FEV1 61%) with 33 total episodes were compared with 56 uninfected pwCF controls. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between cohorts. Among those with incident S. maltophilia infection, sputum communities did not cluster based on infection timeline (Pre, At, Post). Communities differed between the infection cohort and controls (n = 56) based on Shannon Diversity Index (SDI, p = 0.04) and clustered based on Aitchison distance (PERMANOVA, p = 0.01) prior to infection. At the time of incident S. maltophilia isolation, communities did not differ in SDI but clustered based on Aitchison distance (PERMANOVA, p = 0.03) in those that ultimately developed persistent infection versus those that were transient. S. maltophilia abundance within sputum was increased in samples from patients (Pre) relative to controls, measuring both relative (p = 0.004) and absolute (p = 0.001). Furthermore, S. maltophilia abundance was increased in sputum at incident infection in those who ultimately developed persistent infection relative to those with transient infection, measured relatively (p = 0.04) or absolute (p = 0.04), respectively. Conclusion Microbial community composition of CF sputum associates with S. maltophilia infection acquisition as well as infection outcome. Our study suggests sputum microbiome may serve as a surrogate for identifying infection risk and persistence risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".