Bearing fault diagnosis method based on angular domain resampling, relative position matrix and transfer learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bearings are key components in mechanical equipment, which are widely used in various fields such as automobiles and airplanes. Aiming at the analysis of vibration signal processing under the variable speed condition of bearings, this paper proposes a new bearing fault diagnosis method, which firstly resamples the vibration signals in the angular domain, and then converts the resampled signals into images by the relative position matrix method, and finally uses the transfer learning to automatically extract the features and classify them. To verify the effectiveness of the method, it is tested on the Case Western Reserve University bearing fault dataset and University of Ottawa bearing fault dataset respectively. Compared with other time series to image methods (Recurrence Plot, etc) and other pre-trained models (GoogLeNet, etc), the proposed method has some advantages in terms of accuracy, image generation time, training time, and testing time. The accuracy of the proposed method in this paper reaches more than 90%, which suggests its potential effectiveness in the classification of bearing faults under variable speed working conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".