MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394872128 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irae036.242

608 Timing of Nanocrystalline Silver-based Dressing Application – a Retrospective Single-center Pediatric Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4394872128 on OpenAlexaff
Marshall Thibedeau, Julia Wenskus, Jennifer Zuccaro, Eduardo Gus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSilver sulfadiazineBurn centerSingle CenterRetrospective cohort studyTotal body surface areaSurgeryLogistic regressionCohortBurn injuryPediatric burnIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineEmergency medicinePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Nanocrystalline silver-based dressings (NSBD) are commonly used at different stages of the treatment of burn wounds. They have been shown to reduce the incidence of surgical procedures, time to re-epithelialization in partial thickness burn injuries, and decrease pain with dressing changes compared to silver sulfadiazine in adult and pediatric populations. Recent evidence has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in addition to the known antimicrobial properties. We hypothesized that the timing of nanocrystalline silver-based dressings application ( < 24h after burn injury) may impact surgical treatment rates. Methods This study was a retrospective single-center cohort study. All pediatric patients ( < 18 years old) treated at a single academic pediatric center for acute partial thickness burn injuries, between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were included. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare timing of nanocrystalline silver application and surgical treatment rates. Results Four hundred seventy-six patients were included for analysis. One hundred four (21.85%) had NSBD and 372 (78.11%) had non-silver non-adherent dressings applied within the first 24 hours post injury. No statistically significant difference was found in surgical treatment, age, sex, mechanism, anatomic location, or total body surface area (TBSA) on bivariate analysis. The multivariable logistic regression identified three statistically significant variables as predictors for surgical treatment: age (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.06-1.23]), TBSA (OR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.06-1.25]), and burns to buttocks/lower extremity burns (excluding feet) (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.26-4.53]). Immediate ( < 24h) application of NSBD has not been demonstrated to decrease the likelihood of surgical treatment. Conclusions Immediate ( < 24h) application of nanocrystalline silver-based dressings does not affect surgical treatment rates. Prospective randomized studies are required to investigate the potential anti-inflammatory benefits of early nanocrystalline silver-based dressings in the treatment of pediatric burn injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice Use of nanocrystalline silver should be recommended as per clinical indications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207