MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394872384 · doi:10.1002/cncr.35326

Guidelines needed for the management of fear of cancer recurrence in adult survivors of cancer in the United States: A consensus statement

2024· article· en· W4394872384 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel L. Hall, Lynne I. Wagner, Sophie Lebel, Allan Ben Smith, Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Elyse R. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Center for Complementary and Integrative HealthNational Institutes of HealthNew South Wales GovernmentDepartment of Health, New South Wales Government
KeywordsMedicinePsychosocialCancerReferralCancer recurrenceAnxietyStatement (logic)Depression (economics)Family medicinePsychiatryCancer survivorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fear of cancer recurrence remains unaddressed in guidelines for managing anxiety and depression in adult cancer survivors in the United States. To ensure comprehensive psychosocial care, guidelines are needed for the clinical management of fear of cancer recurrence, including recommendations for screening, referral, and treatment pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0160.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207