MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394874226 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000002156

Visual and Pharmacotherapy Outcomes After Transverse Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2024· article· en· W4394874226 on OpenAlexaff
Armin Handzic, Jim Shenchu Xie, Eef J. Hendriks, Pascal J. Mosimann, Patrick Nicholson, Jonathan A. Micieli, Edward Margolin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePapilledemaPharmacotherapyInterquartile rangePseudotumor cerebriRetrospective cohort studyVisual acuitySurgeryInternal medicineIntracranial pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Transverse sinus stenting (TSS) is an increasingly common treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, detailed neuro-ophthalmic evidence on visual and pharmacotherapy outcomes after TSS is scarce and heterogeneous. This study aimed to describe the visual outcomes of patients undergoing TSS for IIH and to ascertain the proportion of patients who could be weaned off intracranial pressure (ICP)-lowering medication postoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with IIH from 2 tertiary academic neuro-ophthalmology practices who underwent TSS between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Indications for stenting included failure of pharmacotherapy, intolerance of pharmacotherapy, and acute vision loss from severe papilledema. Data on demographics, symptoms, visual function, pharmacotherapy, and TSS were collected. The paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare changes in visual acuity (VA) and visual field mean deviation (VFMD) between the baseline and most recent visits. RESULTS: Of the 435 patients with IIH, 15 (13 women) met inclusion criteria. After TSS, ICP-lowering pharmacotherapy was discontinued in 10 patients and decreased in 4; 1 patient was not on ICP-lowering medication before TSS. All patients experienced resolution or improvement of symptoms (10 resolution, 4 improved, 1 asymptomatic before TSS) and papilledema (11 resolution, 4 improved) after stenting. Papilledema resolution was confirmed with optical coherence tomography-measured peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness (median decrease 147 µm, interquartile range 41.8-242.8 µm, P < 0.001). Change in VA between the baseline and most recent visit was not significant, but VFMD improved significantly after stenting (median increase 3.0, IQR 2.0-4.2, P < 0.001). No patient developed transverse sinus restenosis nor in-stent thrombosis postoperatively across a median venogram follow-up of 20.8 (11.3-49.8) weeks. In addition, no patient required subsequent surgical intervention for IIH. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with IIH and fulminant presentation, medication resistance, or medication intolerance, TSS was an effective and safe treatment modality. Most patients were able to stop ICP-lowering medications while demonstrating striking improvement in symptomatology and visual function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207