CGKPN: Cross-Graph Knowledge Propagation Network with Adaptive Connection for Reasoning-Based Machine Reading Comprehension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The task of machine reading comprehension (MRC) is to enable machine to read and understand a piece of text and then answer the corresponding question correctly. This task requires machine to not only be able to perform semantic understanding but also possess logical reasoning capabilities. Just like human reading, it involves thinking about the text from two interacting perspectives of semantics and logic. However, previous methods based on reading comprehension either consider only the logical structure of the text or only the semantic structure of the text and cannot simultaneously balance semantic understanding and logical reasoning. This single form of reasoning cannot make the machine fully understand the meaning of the text. Additionally, the issue of sparsity in composition presents a significant challenge for models that rely on graph-based reasoning. To this end, a cross-graph knowledge propagation network (CGKPN) with adaptive connection is presented to address the above issues. The model first performs self-view node embedding on the constructed logical graph and semantic graph to update the representations of the graphs. Specifically, a relevance matrix between nodes is introduced to adaptively adjust node connections in response to the challenge posed by sparse graph. Subsequently, CGKPN conducts cross-graph knowledge propagation on nodes that are identical in both graphs, effectively resolving conflicts arising from identical nodes in different views, and enabling the model to better integrate the logical and semantic relationships of the text through efficient interaction. Experiments on the two MRC datasets ReClor and LogiQA indicate the superior performance of our proposed model CGKPN compared to other existing baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".