MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394880628 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52791-3_3

The Stages of the Comic Book Co-creation and the Restitution to the Chiquitano Indigenous People

2024· book-chapter· en· W4394880628 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Parola, Margherita Paola Poto, Gabrielle Natividad

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman rights interventions. · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse multidisciplinary academic research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestitutionComicsIndigenousConjunction (astronomy)Political scienceSociologyProcess (computing)Environmental ethicsMedia studiesEngineeringEngineering ethicsLawComputer scienceEcologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter delves into the analysis of the methodological steps of the co-created process involved in producing a comic book, following the steps outlined in Chapter 2 . Extensive research material, outlined at the end of the book, was utilized throughout the project in conjunction with co-creation stages and legal research. The project focuses on the Chiquitano people from Mato Grosso, Brazil, specifically the community in Vila Nova Barbecho, due to their precarious environmental situation and human rights violations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman rights interventions.Same topicDiverse multidisciplinary academic researchFrench-language works237,207