MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394880922 · doi:10.1007/s10665-024-10357-z

Implicit interpolation method for immersed boundary methods

2024· article· en· W4394880922 on OpenAlexaff
Md Sujaat Ali, Renan de Holanda Sousa, Maha Awad, R. Camarero, Jean‐Yves Trépanier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Boundary (topology)MathematicsImmersed boundary methodMathematical analysisBoundary value problemBilinear interpolationBackward Euler methodDomain (mathematical analysis)Boundary conditions in CFDApplied mathematicsLinear interpolationStencilTrilinear interpolationEuler equationsRobin boundary conditionMixed boundary conditionComputer scienceComputational scienceMotion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Immersed boundary (IB) methods have been successfully implemented for different applications. This paper focuses on the immersed boundary implementation for two different governing equations, namely the diffusion equation and Euler equations, using a bi-linear interpolation for the implementation of the boundary condition. The concept of implicit interpolation is introduced which eradicates the problems faced with the explicit interpolation in which it is required to move away from the boundary in the fluid domain in order to complete the interpolation stencil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering MathematicsSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207