MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394880933 · doi:10.1364/ol.503820

Octave-spanning supercontinuum generation in a CMOS-compatible thin Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> waveguide coated with highly nonlinear TeO<sub>2</sub>

2024· article· en· W4394880933 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hamidu M. Mbonde, Neetesh Singh, Bruno L. Segat Frare, Milan Sinobad, Pooya Torab Ahmadi, Batoul Hashemi, Dawson B. Bonneville, Peter Mascher, Franz X. Kärtner, Jonathan D. B. Bradley

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOptica FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMitacsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsSupercontinuumMaterials scienceWaveguideOpticsOctave (electronics)OptoelectronicsPhotonicsSiliconNonlinear opticsPhotonic-crystal fiberLaserPhysicsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supercontinuum generation (SCG) is an important nonlinear optical process enabling broadband light sources for many applications, for which silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ) has emerged as a leading on-chip platform. To achieve suitable group velocity dispersion and high confinement for broadband SCG the Si 3 N 4 waveguide layer used is typically thick (&gt;∼700 nm), which can lead to high stress and cracks unless specialized processing steps are used. Here, we report on efficient octave-spanning SCG in a thinner moderate-confinement 400-nm Si 3 N 4 platform using a highly nonlinear tellurium oxide (TeO 2 ) coating. An octave supercontinuum spanning from 0.89 to 2.11 µm is achieved at a low peak power of 258 W using a 100-fs laser centered at 1565 nm. Our numerical simulations agree well with the experimental results giving a nonlinear parameter of 2.5 ± 0.5 W −1 m −1 , an increase by a factor of 2.5, when coating the Si 3 N 4 waveguide with a TeO 2 film. This work demonstrates highly efficient SCG via effective dispersion engineering and an enhanced nonlinearity in CMOS-compatible hybrid TeO 2 –Si 3 N 4 waveguides and a promising route to monolithically integrated nonlinear, linear, and active functionalities on a single silicon photonic chip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207