MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394882607 · doi:10.20969/vskm.2024.17(2).7-13

ANGINA SCORE ANALYSIS BASED ON CLINICAL FINDINGS AND ON THE RESULTS OF STRESS-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY EXERCISE TEST IN PATIENTS WITH SILENT MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA

2024· article· en· W4394882607 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
ALSU I. ABDRAHMANOVA, NICOLAY A. TSIBULKIN, NAIL B. AMIROV

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnginaInternal medicineST depressionCardiologyIschemiaCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyMann–Whitney U testPhysical therapyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Introduction. Stress echocardiography is an important method for detecting silent myocardial ischemia. Aim of the study was to analyze the exercise test results in silent ischemia and ordinary angina (control group) and compare angina scores based on exercise tests or clinical findings. Materials and Methods. Data of 202 patients were analyzed. Stress tests were performed using a treadmill. The statistics included parametric t-test criterion for normally distributed samples and nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Fisher criteria for the other ones. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. Results and Discussion. According to exercise tests in patients with ST depression, the angina scores were higher in the control group (M=2.1) than in the silent ischemia group (M=1.03, p=0.000001). Angina scores based on clinical findings did not differ between the groups. Among patients with decrease in contractility in exercise test, angina scores were higher in the control group (M=2.29) than in the silent ischemia group (M=1.36, p=0.000001). In the silent ischemia group, angina scores based on exercise tests were higher (p=0.015) than those based on clinical findings. In the control group, angina scores based on exercise tests were lower (p=0.0003) than those based on clinical findings. In the silent ischemia group, ventricular extrasystole occurred in exercise tests less frequently than in the control group (p=0.04). Conclusions. In exercise tests with ST depression, in the silent ischemia group, angina scores based on exercise tests coincide with those based on clinical findings; in the control group, angina scores based on exercise test are lower than those based on clinical findings. In exercise test with a decrease in segmental contractility, in the silent ischemia group, angina scores based on exercise tests are higher than those based on clinical findings; in the control group, angina scores based on exercise tests are lower than those based on clinical findings. Maximum ST depression is greater in the silent ischemia group than in control one, which indicates a pronounced myocardial ischemia in the silent ischemia group on exercise. Ventricular extrasystole occurred less frequently in the silent ischemia group than in the control group on exercise test with ST depression or with a decrease in segmental contractility. In silent myocardial ischemia patients, their myocardium tolerates exercise tests worse than that of the patients in the control group, which may be a typical characteristic of silent ischemia myocardium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical MedicineSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207