Investigating the role of supply chain management on sustainable performance and dynamic capabilities: An empirical study on logistic organization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the effect of supply chain management (SCM) on sustainability performance (SP), the effect of dynamic capabilities (DC) on sustainability performance and finally the effect of SCM on DC. The study uses a quantitative method with a questionnaire approach to investigate the relationship between endogenous and exogenous variables using the Likert scale. The respondents for this research were 680 logistics company owners in Indonesia determined using a simple random sampling method. The results show that SCM had a positive and significant relationship with SP. DC also had a positive and significant relationship with SP and recommends that company owners create policies to increase dynamic capabilities to improve company performance. Finally, DC in our survey had a positive and significant relationship to SP and strengthened the findings of previous findings. Moreover, SCM had a positive and significant relationship with DC, which recommends company owners make policies to improve SCM to increase DC. This research provides input to organizational owners to implement supply chain management, and dynamic capabilities to improve company performance and competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it