MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394888162 · doi:10.7759/cureus.58427

The Saudi Population's Knowledge and Attitude Towards Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Its Vaccination

2024· article· en· W4394888162 on OpenAlexaff
Salim Ali Algaadi, Hamad J Aldhafiri, Razan Safir M Alsubhi, Mohammed Almakrami, Nour H Aljamaan, Yazeed A Almulhim

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman papillomavirusVaccinationVirologyHPV infectionPopulationMedicineCervical cancerEnvironmental healthInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major worldwide public health concern that can result in a range of clinical disorders, including cervical cancer. Saudi Arabia, similar to numerous other nations, has difficulties in facing HPV and its impact on society. The high incidence of cervical cancer in Saudi Arabia continues to be a cause for worry, highlighting the need for the adoption of efficient immunization programs. Nevertheless, public hesitation and inadequate knowledge can hinder the acceptance of vaccines. Evaluating public knowledge and attitudes concerning HPV and its vaccination is essential in order to create focused programs that enhance awareness and increase vaccine acceptance. METHODS: This study was cross-sectional in nature, using data from a sample of 516 Saudi participants 18 years and above. The participants completed online questionnaires that were distributed using Google Forms across social media platforms and ensured anonymity. RESULTS: A total of 516 participants made up the sample for this study, which had a predominance of females (83.5%, n=431); the majority aged 18-25 years (78.3%, n=404) and most of them (28.3%, n=146) were from the central region. The study results revealed that 43.7% (n=225) of the participants had a good knowledge level while 56.3% (n=291) of them had a poor level of knowledge about the HPV vaccine. A substantial proportion (35.9%, n=185) of the participants had good knowledge that HPV can be transmitted sexually from one person to another with only 30.2% (n=156) of them being aware that HPV is a common infection that causes cervical cancer (41.5%, n=214) and most of them (76.2%, n=393) knew that cervical cancer can be cured particularly when detected in early stages. The results established statistically significant associations between gender, education level, and occupation with p-values <0.005 (0.023, 0.003 and 0.001 respectively) and level of knowledge about the HPV vaccine. CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes the necessity of implementing focused health education and vaccination initiatives in Saudi Arabia to enhance understanding and attitudes regarding HPV infection and its vaccine. The results can provide guidance to healthcare professionals, legislators, and public health authorities in creating programs that increase knowledge and acceptance of the HPV vaccine, ultimately decreasing the prevalence of HPV-related diseases in the nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→