Bibliographic record
Abstract
anti-Canadianism:opposed to the state of being Canadian (Bomb Canada) Anti-Canadianism, anti-Canuckism -call it what you will, it's hard to find a definition in contemporary dictionaries for the act of bashing Canada.Surprising?Not really.While scholars in Canada and the United States have studied anti-Americanism in depth, anti-Canadianism has largely been neglected, left on the bench you could say as America-bashing comments take centre ice.Yet that doesn't mean it's irrelevant.The relationship between Canada and the United States has been compared to that of siblings -or jilted lovers inexplicably drawn back together over, and over, and over again.It's a complex history that entwines periods of tension and reconciliation.In 1776, almost a century before Canada's Dominion Day celebrations, the Thirteen Colonies issued a Declaration of Independence and invited the four other British colonies in North America -Quebec, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland -to join a revolt against Britain.These colonies, much to the surprise of the fledgling United States, refused, in essence placing loyalty to the monarchy over that of a republic.The War of 1812 further cemented Canadian ties to the Brit-t t ish.Simmering trade and sovereignty disputes erupted in vio-xi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".