MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394889480 · doi:10.1515/9782763759326-fm

Front Matter

2022· paratext· fr· W4394889480 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean-Marc Narbonne, Françis Lacroix, Maurício Pagotto Marsola, Zeke Mazur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsCanada Council for the Arts
FundersCanada Council for the Arts
KeywordsFront (military)GeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COLLECTION ZÊTÊSISLa collection Zêtêsis, terme qui signifie en grec étude, recherche ou enquête, notamment de nature philosophique, a pour but de présenter des ouvrages qui portent autant sur l'histoire de la philosophie et de ses textes que sur les thèmes et les débats philosophiques les plus actuels.En tant que collection placée sous le signe de la ζήτησις, elle accueille aussi bien les études plus spécialisées, textes et essais, les approches esthétiques que les divers instruments de recherche et de diffusion que se donne la réflexion philosophique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9940.787

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207