MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394889480 · doi:10.1515/9782763759326-fm

Front Matter

2022· paratext· fr· W4394889480 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean-Marc Narbonne, Françis Lacroix, Maurício Pagotto Marsola, Zeke Mazur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsCanada Council for the Arts
FundersCanada Council for the Arts
KeywordsFront (military)GeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COLLECTION ZÊTÊSISLa collection Zêtêsis, terme qui signifie en grec étude, recherche ou enquête, notamment de nature philosophique, a pour but de présenter des ouvrages qui portent autant sur l'histoire de la philosophie et de ses textes que sur les thèmes et les débats philosophiques les plus actuels.En tant que collection placée sous le signe de la ζήτησις, elle accueille aussi bien les études plus spécialisées, textes et essais, les approches esthétiques que les divers instruments de recherche et de diffusion que se donne la réflexion philosophique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8980.840

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207