Markov Field network model of multi-modal data predicts effects of immune system perturbations on intravenous BCG vaccination in macaques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of multi-modal datasets can identify multi-scale interactions underlying biological systems, but can be beset by spurious connections due to indirect impacts propagating through an unmapped biological network. For example, studies in macaques have shown that BCG vaccination by an intravenous route protects against tuberculosis, correlating with changes across various immune data modes. To eliminate spurious correlations and identify critical immune interactions in a public multi-modal dataset (systems serology, cytokines, cytometry) of vaccinated macaques, we applied Markov Fields (MF), a data-driven approach that explains vaccine efficacy and immune correlations via multivariate network paths, without requiring large numbers of samples (i.e. macaques) relative to multivariate features. Furthermore, we find that integrating multiple data modes with MFs helps to remove spurious connections. Finally, we used the MF to predict outcomes of perturbations at various immune nodes, including a B-cell depletion that induced network-wide shifts without reducing vaccine protection, which we validated experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".