MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394891175 · doi:10.3390/proceedings2024097191

Optimization of Micro-Electromechanical Lorentz Actuator Using a Surrogate Model Accelerated Genetic Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4394891175 on OpenAlexafffund
Phiona Buhr, Cyrus Shafai, Byoungyoul Park, Yunli Wang, М. С. Белов

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsActuatorFinite element methodSurrogate modelDisplacement (psychology)Genetic algorithmComputationControl theory (sociology)Multi-objective optimizationMicroelectromechanical systemsComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A surrogate model (SM)-assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) is presented that is used to accelerate the performance optimization of a MEMS actuator. The GA employs both finite element method (FEM) simulations and the SM together to undertake the multi-objective optimization. The algorithm evolves the actuator geometry to meet a required 1 µm displacement while seeking to achieve the objectives of minimal temperature rise and resonant frequency over 5 kHz. The result is a continuous surface of Pareto optimal designs for the decision maker to choose from. The SM was found to compute similar solutions as the FEM with a 100,000× faster computation speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207