MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394891237 · doi:10.1785/0120230162

Baseline Correction of Ground Motions for Linearly Detrended Accelerograms

2024· article· en· W4394891237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaseline (sea)Geodetic datumGeodesyGround motionDetrended fluctuation analysisTilt (camera)GeologySeismologyMathematicsGeometryScaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT By revisiting the accelerograms from 42 strong-motion stations in Hualien County that recorded the 2018 Mw 6.4 Hualien earthquake, we identified that the released “raw accelerograms” were linearly detrended to remove baselines. Baseline correction for these linearly detrended accelerograms is challenging, because the baseline drift patterns are more complex than typically recognized ones. To deal with this problem, here we propose a jerk correction pattern in addition to our previously proposed tilt correction pattern and cumulative correction pattern. The modified baseline correction procedure corrects all 126 accelerograms for three directions of the 42 strong-motion stations. The recovered ground displacements are consistent with geodetic measurements, demonstrating complex surface deformations in the close vicinity of the Milun fault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it