MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394891237 · doi:10.1785/0120230162

Baseline Correction of Ground Motions for Linearly Detrended Accelerograms

2024· article· en· W4394891237 on OpenAlexaff
Shengze Tian, M. Shahria Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaseline (sea)Geodetic datumGeodesyGround motionDetrended fluctuation analysisTilt (camera)GeologySeismologyMathematicsGeometryScaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT By revisiting the accelerograms from 42 strong-motion stations in Hualien County that recorded the 2018 Mw 6.4 Hualien earthquake, we identified that the released “raw accelerograms” were linearly detrended to remove baselines. Baseline correction for these linearly detrended accelerograms is challenging, because the baseline drift patterns are more complex than typically recognized ones. To deal with this problem, here we propose a jerk correction pattern in addition to our previously proposed tilt correction pattern and cumulative correction pattern. The modified baseline correction procedure corrects all 126 accelerograms for three directions of the 42 strong-motion stations. The recovered ground displacements are consistent with geodetic measurements, demonstrating complex surface deformations in the close vicinity of the Milun fault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyFrench-language works237,207