MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394894064 · doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100341

Relations Between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cognition in Older Adults With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment From the Aerobic Exercise and Cognitive Training (ACT) Trial: Sex Differences

2024· article· en· W4394894064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fang Yu, Dereck Salisbury, Keenan A. Pituch, Feng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessAerobic exerciseCognitionCognitive impairmentPsychologyEpisodic memoryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationClinical psychologyGerontologyPhysical therapyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To examine the associations of cardiorespiratory fitness with executive function, episodic memory, and global cognition and sex differences in these associations in community-dwelling older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Design A cross-sectional study using baseline data from the aerobic exercise and cognitive training (ACT) trial. Setting The ACT trial conducted exercise testing in an exercise laboratory and data collections in a research facility. Participants ACT trial participants were recruited through referrals, registries, exhibits, flyers, media, and advertisements and screened for eligibility. To be eligible for this study, ACT enrollees needed complete data on all study variables. Among 146 ACT enrollees, 142 met eligibility for this study (N=142). Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured as peak oxygen consumption (Vo 2peak ) with a peak cycle-ergometer test, executive function with the EXAMINER, episodic memory with the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, and global cognition with Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Results The average age of the sample was 73.8±5.8 years with 16.9±2.9 years of education, with 87.3% White, 51.4% men, and 69.7% married. After controlling for covariates, Vo 2peak was significantly related to executive function ( b =.037, standard error [SE]=0.015, P =.0154, semipartial [ sr ] correlation coefficient=.239) and episodic memory ( b =.590, SE=0.226, P= .0102, sr =.216), but not global cognition ( b =.074, SE=0.055, P= .1837, sr =.125). For men, Vo 2peak was significantly associated with executive function ( b =.063, SE=0.024, P =.0099, r =.430) and episodic memory ( b =1.088, SE=0.312, P =.0009, r =.382). Conclusions Our findings show that Vo 2peak was associated with executive function and episodic memory in the overall sample and in men. Future studies can examine the longitudinal relations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical TranslationSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207