MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394894211 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085850

Building CapaCITY/É for sustainable transportation: protocol for an implementation science research program in healthy cities

2024· article· en· W4394894211 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Meghan Winters, Daniel Fuller, Marie‐Soleil Cloutier, Marianne Harris, Andrew Howard, Yan Kestens, Sara Kirk, Alison Macpherson, Sarah A. Moore, Linda Rothman, Martine Shareck, Jennifer R. Tomasone, Karen Laberee, Zoé Poirier Stephens, Meridith Sones, Darshini Ayton, Brice Batomen, Scott Bell, Patricia Collins, Ehab Diab, Audrey R. Giles, Brent Hagel, Mike S. Harris, Patrick Harris, Ugo Lachapelle, Kevin Manaugh, Raktim Mitra, Nazeem Muhajarine, Tiffany Muller Myrdahl, Christopher Pettit, Ian Pike, Helen Skouteris, David Wachsmuth, David G. T. Whitehurst, Ben Beck

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of CalgaryQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversité de SherbrookePublic Health OntarioYork UniversityDalhousie UniversityToronto Metropolitan UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaSimon Fraser UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSimon Fraser University
KeywordsPsychological interventionSustainable transportNexus (standard)Equity (law)Population healthCapacity buildingMedicinePublic relationsPopulationSustainabilityPolitical scienceEconomic growthEngineeringEnvironmental healthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Improving sustainable transportation options will help cities tackle growing challenges related to population health, congestion, climate change and inequity. Interventions supporting active transportation face many practical and political hurdles. Implementation science aims to understand how interventions or policies arise, how they can be translated to new contexts or scales and who benefits. Sustainable transportation interventions are complex, and existing implementation science frameworks may not be suitable. To apply and adapt implementation science for healthy cities, we have launched our mixed-methods research programme, CapaCITY/É. We aim to understand how, why and for whom sustainable transportation interventions are successful and when they are not. Methods and analysis Across nine Canadian municipalities and the State of Victoria (Australia), our research will focus on two types of sustainable transportation interventions: all ages and abilities bicycle networks and motor vehicle speed management interventions. We will (1) document the implementation process and outcomes of both types of sustainable transportation interventions; (2) examine equity, health and mobility impacts of these interventions; (3) advance implementation science by developing a novel sustainable transportation implementation science framework and (4) develop tools for scaling up and scaling out sustainable transportation interventions. Training activities will develop interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners able to work at the nexus of academia and sustainable cities. Ethics and dissemination This study received approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Ethics Research (H22-03469). A Knowledge Mobilization Hub will coordinate dissemination of findings via a website; presentations to academic, community organisations and practitioner audiences; and through peer-reviewed articles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.131
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1310.132
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1800.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.403
GPT teacher head0.646
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicUrban Transport and Accessibility→French-language works237,207→