Utilitarian value and hedonic value: Empirical evidence of purchase intention at Soekarno-Hatta international airport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem at Soekarno-Hatta Airport was the need for more facilities with value for consumers, both utilitarian and hedonic. The research examines the impact of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Purchase Intentions, which Customer Intentions mediate. Based on the data, the research approach used was quantitative. According to the explanation category, this research is asymmetric causal research. The study population comprised business class passengers of full-service airlines at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport with various destinations, and the sample size was 219 respondents. The sampling technique was non-probability sampling, in this case, incidental sampling. The method of secondary data collection used was a study-desk with technical data using SEM-PLS. The results showed that Hedonic Value and Purchase Intention directly and significantly influenced Customer Intention and Purchase Intention. Customer Intention Hedonic Value had a positive but insignificant impact on purchase intention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".