Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is hard to imagine a person who embodied the ideals of postwar Canadian foreign policy more than John Wendell Holmes.From his tireless work ethic, to his fierce loyalty to family and friends, to his commitment to peaceful forms of conflict resolution, to his unyielding desire to make a difference in the world, he approached life and country in a way that would make citizens of any political stripe proud.As a boy growing up in early twentieth-century London, Ontario, he was a successful student, widely respected for his contributions inside and outside the classroom.After a brief career as a high school teacher and then administrator for the Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA), he entered public life and quickly became an exceptional diplomat, recognized around the world for his thoughtfulness, humility, and dedication.At the age of fifty he returned to the CIIA, this time as its president and then director general, and he expanded the depth and breadth of published research on Canadian foreign relations exponentially.In the late 1960s, he added to his responsibilities a part-time professorship at the University of Toronto and evolved to become a brilliant teacher and mentor to countless future scholars and policy practitioners.Throughout this period, he was also internationally revered as an esteemed commentator on global politics.In his final years, he was as much a prophet as an analyst, boldly calling on the international community to pay greater attention to issues such as environmental degradation and the spread of pandemic diseases well before such ideas were common within the mainstream foreign policy discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.416 | 0.206 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".