Short video marketing and consumer engagement: Mediation effect of social sharing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to examine the complex dynamics of short video marketing, social sharing, and consumer engagement specifically within the tourism sector in Jordan. The study used AMOS software for analysis, gathering data from a total of 468 participants, including both internal and external tourists. The results emphasize the significant impact of short video marketing in stimulating social sharing behaviors among travelers, prompting them to share their experiences on various social platforms, thus expanding the reach of tourism-related content. Moreover, the research reveals the mutual relationship between social sharing and consumer engagement, indicating that sharing behaviors play a crucial role in increasing levels of engagement among tourists. The novelty of this research resides in its concentrated investigation of these associations within the unique context of the Jordanian tourism sector. The study's significance lies in its ability to expand comprehension of digital marketing dynamics in the tourism industry, providing practical insights for marketers seeking to improve brand visibility and engagement in digital spaces. This study enhances the current knowledge base by employing a quantitative approach, establishes a basis for future research endeavors, and offers valuable insights for marketers aiming to maximize the effectiveness of digital marketing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".