MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394914638 · doi:10.1089/derm.2024.0059

Tolerability of Meropenem and Ertapenem in a Patient with Documented Delayed Hypersensitivity Reaction to Imipenem–Cilastatin: A Literature Review

2024· review· en· W4394914638 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Randa Laajimi, Khadija Mansour, Zohra Chadli, Nadia Ben Fredj, Haifa Ben Romdhane, Amel Chaabane, Karim Aouam

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatitis · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErtapenemMedicineMeropenemImipenem/cilastatinTolerabilityCilastatinImipenemIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAntibioticsAdverse effectMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the presented case, thrombocytopenia was detected 1 month after starting dupilumab and persisted after 3 years of treatment, without clinical complications and without the need to suspend treatment.Thus, the importance of shared decision-making in a rare adverse effect is evident, avoiding the discontinuation of an effective treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatitisSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207