Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns3:p><p>The article presents estimates of the level and structure of the social minimum in the second quarter of 2025. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, model household expenditures grew faster than inflation. The social minimum increased from 4.9% (for a household of parents with an older child) to 6.2% (for a two-person retiree household), while the Consumer Price Index (CPI) stood at 4.1%. In relation to the first quarter of 2025, social minimum values rose between 1.4% (parents with a younger child) and 1.7% (two-person employee and retiree households), whereas the CPI for the same period was lower, at 0.6%. The primary driver behind the increase in the social minimum was the higher valuation of food products, particularly in categories such as fruit, vegetables, meat, and meat products. Among other groups where dynamics exceeded inflation rates, expenditures on recreation and culture as well as housing needs are noteworthy. Food expenditures increased by 2.7% to 2.8%, while the CPI value was half that (1.4%). Expenditures on culture and recreation rose by 2.4% to 3.5%, despite the CPI indicating price stabilizat</p></ns3:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it