Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article summarises the estimates of the social minimum in the second quarter of 2023. Although the modelled household spending continued to increase during this period, its growth rate was lower than in the first quarter. With the CPI for the second quarter of this year relative to the second quarter of 2022 (13.1%), the values of the social minimum increased at a higher degree: from 15.2% (working household with a younger child) to 18.3% (working household of a single person). When the reference point is the first quarter of this year, the values of the social minimum also increased faster. With a CPI value of 1.9%, the social minimum rose from 3.0% (in a household of two adults with a younger child) to 3.6% (in an employee household of two adults without children). The main reason for the faster increase in the social minimum was higher model expenditure on housing and energy (3.4% - 3.6% depending on household size), as compared to low (+0.2%) infla-tion rate in this group. The dynamics of the value of the food basket was also higher than the CPI. With inflation for this group of needs at +2.9%. the value of food increased the most in adult house-holds and in families with an older child (+3.8 - 3.9%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".