MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394919071 · doi:10.23889/suthesis.66077

Existence and Optimization of the Critical Speed for Travelling Front Solutions with Convection in Unbounded Cylinders

2023· dissertation· en· W4394919071 on OpenAlexaff
Vianney Domenech

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsCegep de Thetford
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounded functionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsNeumann boundary conditionMathematicsBoundary value problemMathematical analysisDirichlet eigenvalueDirichlet distributionDirichlet problemDirichlet boundary conditionDomain (mathematical analysis)Boundary (topology)CylinderOperator (biology)PhysicsGeometryDirichlet's principle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For n > 1, we consider a reaction-diffusion equationut = Δu + α(y)∇ · G(u) + f(u), (0.2)in an unbounded cylinder Ω := R×D, where D ⊂ Rn−1 is a smooth bounded domain, with a presence of a convection term, under both Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions on ∂Ω. For both types of boundary condition, we consider two different forms of convection term, namely : α(y)∇·G(u) and∇ · (α(y)G(u)). The reaction term f is “monostable”. In both Neumann and Dirichlet cases, we prove that there exists a critical speed c⋆ ∈ R such that there exists a travelling front solution of the form u(x, t) = w(x1 −ct, y) with speed c if and only if c ≥ c⋆, where x1 is the coordinate corresponding to theaxis of the cylinder. The critical speed c⋆ often plays an important role for monostable problems by characterizing the long-time behaviour of the initial value problem. The existence of travelling waves for all c ≥ c⋆ is typical of monostable problems such as the prototype Fisher-KPP equation.We give a min-max formula for the speed c⋆. For both types of boundary conditions, we prove that c⋆ is bounded below by a quantity c′ which is related to a certain eigenvalue problem, associated with the linearized problem around 0. Note that under Dirichlet boundary conditions, an extra assumption is needed to ensure that c′ exists, namely, f′(0) has to be greater than the principal eigenvalue of the linearized operator. We discuss two special cases where the equality c⋆ = c′ holds. Under both Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions, the first special case is when G = (G1, 0, · · ·, 0), assuming the so-called KPP condition for f and that α(y)G′ 1(u) ≥ α(y)G′ 1(0), for all y ∈ D and all u ∈ (0, 1). The second case is treated only under Neumann boundary conditions : when G′ 1(0) = 0, assuming the KPP condition for f, and that α(y)G′ 1(u) ≥ 0, for all y ∈ D and u ∈ (0, 1). Note that in that case, we give an explicit formula : c⋆ = c′ = 2 p f′(0). Under Dirichlet boundary conditions, we highlight the influence of the domain D, the reaction term f and the convection term α(y)∇ · G(u) on the critical speed c⋆. In the special case where G = (G1, 0, ···, 0), using that c⋆ = c′, we use the eigenvalue problem related to c′ to establish some optimization results for c⋆.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207