Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur propose un survol historique des différents changements ayant eu lieu à la Maison St-Jacques en ce qui a trait à son approche thérapeutique. La manière par laquelle elle est arrivée à la consolidation de son approche analytique groupale actuelle est brièvement exposée. Un questionnement sur la place qu’occupe actuellement la Maison St-Jacques dans le milieu communautaire est soulevé, notamment en lien avec les récents développements propres au mouvement Action communautaire autonome (ACA) qui secoue certaines assises identitaires chez les organismes qui en font partie. Bien que les mouvements collectifs comme l’ACA cherchent à renforcer l’autonomie de pratique des organismes qui adhèrent à ses principes, la perte d’individualité inhérente à tout mouvement collectif est discutée. Une réflexion ouvrant sur l’avenir de l’identité et de l’autonomie d’intervention de la Maison St-Jacques est offerte en conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".