MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CONTACT PROBLEM FOR A PAD COUPLED TO AN ELASTIC QUARTER-PLANE.

2024· article· en· W4394923285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSTRUCTURAL MECHANICS AND ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTIONS · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPlane (geometry)OverlayQuarter (Canadian coin)Shear (geology)Shear forceBendingGeometryStructural engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper considers the problem of contact between a pad attached to an elastic quarter-plane under the action of a horizontal force. The normal and shear stresses between the overlay and the quarter plane are determined. The problem is solved by B.N. Zhemochkin’s method by dividing the contact area into twenty sections. Results were obtained for changing the longitudinal force in the pad. It is shown that the presence of a quarter-plane edge introduces disturbances into the distribution of normal and tangential stresses in comparison with similar results for a half-plane. The results for the rigid overlay are shown separately. It is concluded that it is necessary to take into account bending moments when calculating linings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it