MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394932217 · doi:10.4171/owr/2023/36

Geometric Spectral Theory

2024· article· en· W4394932217 on OpenAlexaff
Asma Hassannezhad, Luc Hillairet, Konstantin Pankrashkin, Iosif Polterovich

Bibliographic record

VenueOberwolfach Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectral geometry is a rapidly developing field with new classes of operators, boundary value problems and geometric objects arising in different applications. At the same time, classical problems continue gaining novel flavors. The main focus of the workshop was on some of the most significant recent developments in geometric spectral theory including geometry of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, singular spectral problems, and spectral optimization. The talks were complemented by three thematic open problem sessions on the main topics of the meeting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOberwolfach ReportsSame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207