MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394933053 · doi:10.1115/1.4065346

Numerical Analysis of High Frequency Transverse Instabilities in a Can-Type Combustor

2024· article· en· W4394933053 on OpenAlexaff
Sandeep Jella, Marc Füri, Vasilis Katsapis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsSiemens (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustorTransverse planeMechanicsNumerical analysisFrequency analysisMaterials sciencePhysicsAcousticsMathematicsEngineeringChemistryStructural engineeringCombustionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dry low emissions (DLE) systems are well-known to be susceptible to thermoacoustic instabilities. In particular, transverse, spinning modes of high frequency may appear, and lead to severe damage in a matter of seconds. The thermoacoustic response of an engine is usually specific to the combustor geometry, operating conditions and difficult to reproduce at the lab-scale. In this work, details of high frequency dynamics (HFD) observed during the early development phase of a new DLE system are provided, where a multipeaked spectrum was noticed during testing. Beginning with an analysis of the measured pressure spectra from three different concepts, an analytical model of the clockwise and anticlockwise transverse waves was fitted to the experimental data using a nonlinear curve fitting approach to produce a simple yet useful understanding of the phenomena. A flamelet-based large eddy simulation (LES) of the entire combustion system was used to complement this analysis and confirm the mode shapes using dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). Both approaches independently identified a spinning second-order mode as the dominant one in the high frequency regime. The LES indicates the coupling of a distortion of swirl profile with a precessing vortex core as a possible cause for the onset of instability. With regard to modeling sensitivities, it is shown that subgrid scale combustion modeling has a strong impact on predicted amplitudes. Ultimately, a thickened-flame model with a modified efficiency function provided consistent results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207