MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394933070 · doi:10.1007/s10846-024-02088-1

Adaptive Non-singular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Car-Like Vehicles with Faded Neighborhood Information and Actuator Faults

2024· article· en· W4394933070 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoud Hussein, Youmin Zhang, Zhaoheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsActuatorTerminal sliding modeTerminal (telecommunication)Mode (computer interface)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Sliding mode controlComputer networkPhysicsArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study addresses the problem of cooperative control design for a group of car-like vehicles encountering fading channels, actuator faults, and external disturbances. It is presumed that certain followers lack direct access to the states of the leader via a directed graph. This arises challenges in maintaining synchronization and coordination within the network. The proposed control strategy utilizes non-singular fast terminal sliding mode control to accelerate consensus tracking and enhance the convergence of the overall system. This controller is designed to mitigate the impact of actuator faults in the presence of fading channels in the communication network. The effects of such issues on team performance are rigorously analyzed. Based on the Lyapunov stability principle, it has been demonstrated that the controller is capable of providing satisfactory performance for the entire system despite these challenges. Moreover, vehicle synchronization can be effectively maintained. Numerical simulations are conducted to verify the theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent & Robotic SystemsSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207