Schouppe J.-P., Relations entre Église et communauté politique. Doctrines. Pratiques juridiques , coll. Gratianus - Série Manuels, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur, 2020, 18x25, 342 p., 34,95 $. ISBN 978-2-924974-05-6
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1934, Henri de Lubac published an article with the innocuous title « Remarques sur l’histoire du mot ‘supernaturel’ » in the Nouvelle revue théologique. Yet it challenged the theological options of modern Christian anthropology. This programmatic article is introduced historically by Bernard Joassart from the NRT archives, and illuminated theologically and pastorally by Marie-Gabrielle Lemaire. It is completed by translations of foreign texts. Finally, the essential study by Hans Urs von Balthasar, published in 1975 in the NRT: « Henri de Lubac. l’oeuvre organique d’une vie » (Henri de Lubac: the organic work of a life), a true introduction to the study of his colleague and friend. The preface is by Brigitte Cholvy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.079 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".