The impact of digital marketing, social media, and digital transformation on the development of digital leadership abilities and the enhancement of employee performance: A case study of the Amman Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study seeks to analyze the impact of digital marketing, social media, and digital transformation on the development of digital leadership abilities and the resulting enhancement of employee performance. The research examines the complex connections between digital elements and their influence on organizational dynamics, using a case study done at the Amman Stock Exchange as a basis for analysis. The inquiry explores the impact of digital marketing strategies on leadership skills, the use of social media platforms to promote digital leadership, and the transforming influence of digital initiatives on employee performance. In addition, the study evaluates the interaction of these characteristics and their combined impact on organizational success. Evidence suggests that digital methods have a complex and wide-ranging effect on leadership and performance, including factors such as adaptation, communication, and strategic decision-making. The study highlights the capacity of companies, specifically within the framework of the Amman Stock Exchange, to utilize digital tools for the purpose of developing leadership skills and improving performance. The findings obtained from this study provide important insights for enhancing digital ecosystems in comparable organizational contexts, highlighting the importance of a thorough comprehension and strategic integration of digital components in order to attain long-lasting success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".