Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il viaggio come esperienza fondativa dell’identità migrante, nelle letterature che ne sono espressione, assume spesso un ruolo strutturale che va ben al di là del mero valore tematico. Nell’ambito delle letterature francofone, uno degli orientamenti più innovativi della critica come la transpoétique, teorizzata e applicata dallo scrittore e critico franco-ontariano di origine tunisina Hédi Bouraoui, individua nelle implicazioni sottese al viaggio, all’emigrazione, all’erranza delle precise strategie di composizione del testo letterario e, conseguentemente, di analisi testuale. In base a tale prospettiva critica, questa comunicazione si propone di investigare come il viaggio oltrepassi lo spazio geografico per lasciar traccia sull’identità e sulla scrittura nell’opera di autori italo-canadesi di lingua francese, quali Fulvio Caccia, Lisa Carducci, Bianca Zagolin, assegnando così alla definizione di “letteratura migrante” un significato più pregnante, inerente alla pratica stessa della scrittura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".