Non-hermitian magnonic knobbing between electromagnetically induced reflection and transparancy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manipulation of wave propagation through open resonant systems has attracted tremendous interest. When accessible to the open system, the system under study is prone to tempering to out of equilibrium, and a lack of reciprocity is the rule rather than the exception. Open systems correspond to non-hermitian Hamiltonians with very unique properties such as resulting exceptional points and ideal isolation. Here, we have found a highly sensitive modulation for the intersection of resonant patch antennas with respect to cavity magnonic coupling by means of an open coupling system of three resonant modes. Two types of crossings are implemented in this study: the first type of crossing remotely controls the sharp switching of the transmission line 's transmittance, while regulating the repulsive behavior of its zero-reflection states. The second type of crossing corresponds to the modulation of non-reciprocal phase transitions, which enables a more desirable isolation effect. Three different coupling models are realized by a non-Hermitian scattering Hamiltonian, revealing distinct spatial overlaps between modes. This elucidates that dissipative coupling of at least two modes to the environment is crucial for non-reciprocal transport. Our work not only reveals the versatility of cavity magnonic systems but also provides a way to design functional devices for general wave optics using patch antenna crossings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it